Making hard choices for materials that last the distance

Material matters
While the new solution’s functionality was, of course, of crucial importance, so was the ability to carry out the task of treating a vessel’s ballast water year after year with superb reliability – ensuring it can smoothly sail from port to port. And, when it comes to reliability, few things matter more than the composition and durability of the materials chosen.

“When you’re designing any treatment solution, the cost of individual components is naturally an important consideration,” says Mark. “But we needed the right ones and, in DESMI’s world, that means components that are highly applicable as well as highly reliable – something that has a lot to do with material choices.”

The DESMI R&D team re-visited every part of the design thinking from the earlier joint venture, departing from this thinking wherever it might make sense. For example, where the original intention had been to weld the unit’s casing, an attempt was made to cast and machine it instead, seeking to avoid issues encountered with tolerances in the previous welded prototypes. The attempt succeeded, enabling DESMI to adapt the unit to much more accurate tolerances than had been seen in the marketplace with competing products. Mark comments:
“With the basic design of the system in place, it was then time to decide on which materials should be used. These machines need to be able to withstand internal pressure up to 10 bars and they have to be able to operate reliably in a harsh, corrosive marine environment. Should we, for example, choose corrosive-resistant titanium – a material that could withstand almost any punishment thrown at it – or could we find a material that offered very high resistance yet cost somewhat less?”

Hard choices
The choice narrowed down to two highly durable materials: Super duplex stainless steel – a high-alloy duplex steel – or nickel-alu-bronze, which is a copper-based high-alloy. The cost of these two materials is quite similar, certainly when compared with far more expensive titanium. And they are similar, too, in their ability to handle corrosion.

But in a system where UV lighting increases the temperature of a sodium chloride solution (seawater), even if it’s only to 40 °C, corrosion becomes an even greater threat, requiring in-depth analysis of the two metals’ ability to withstand its effects.

Super duplex is less resistant to pitting than nickel-alu-bronze. Nickel-alu-bronze, on the other hand, is less resistant to erosion, a form of corrosion that can be a factor wherever high flow rates are involved. This risk was eliminated by the CFD analysis of maximum velocities. So, once all the analysis was complete, nickel-alu-bronze won the day, imposing fewer salinity or temperature constraints on the system than its rival.

Leaders in the field
Once a new – or significantly different – ballast water management system’s design is in place, the manufacturer is required to install it on a vessel, which then operates with the system for more than six months. The manufacturer must visit the vessel three times during this period to test the unit. If all goes well, it is then able to be IMO-approved – a result that also demands 15 land-based tests in three different salinities (fresh, brackish and marine water), as well as environmental and scaling tests to show that all living organisms can be removed without harming the environment into which the water is discharged.

Aiming for a small-footprint system that uses a novel approach to ballast water treatment is a combination that has enabled DESMI CompactClean to easily meet and, with its ability to kill organisms within just two hours, to beat the USCG TA tests’ mandatory 24-hour holding time for ballast water before discharge. These capabilities, along with DESMI’s characteristic attention to detail in material choices, ensure the system will work as promised for years to come with minimal operating cost.